Talk:A Vision of the Last Judgement

Assessment
Hekerui (talk) 17:00, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I added some wikilinks, I think the article needed some more; I also changed some language to make things clearer
 * The article could perhaps use some image of William Blake - why not one of the less often used ones, like File:WilliamBlake-portert-pSC1808.jpeg?
 * Why not consider using the viewer's right and left view with regard to Jesus - it's midly confusing as it is now imo
 * "... removes the traditional hiding apocalyptic imagery's representation components" is unclear
 * "in the centre is the book of death. At the top is the book of life, and the Christian Church is the figure of a woman on top of the moon" - could that me made more clear, just from reading it and looking at the HQ picture I can't tell where each of these things is
 * what does "In terms of the basis of the painting" mean? Is "the basis" the reason why he painted it?
 * "apocalypse within the human experience" does that mean in his lifetime? it's vague
 * which David Hartley is it? that should be linked
 * the Jerusalem by Blake should be linked - is it the book or the hymn?
 * I think there is only ever one apocalypse, so it should be "an apocalypse" instead of "the apocalypse", or not?
 * "having to confront error" - probably means one's own errors, should be clarified
 * "dismissed the idea of allegory except" doesn't that nead a comma or how is it meant?
 * "Blake's understanding of time is similar to the way Samuel Taylor Coleridge the understanding of time and the state of limbo within his poem 'Limbo'." the grammar is wrong in this sentence and needs to be corrected
 * The right and the left are based on the specific wordings of Blake himself. they are symbollic in Blake's mind, and he is focused on the perspective of Jesus within the letter. By the way, this isn't a GA review. :P If you want, I can nominate it for GA after expanding it more. That way, you can perform a real review of it. :) I made some fixes, by the way. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm sorry you had to "deal with this". Happy editing. Hekerui (talk) 19:08, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I was referring to arguing over a minor point that was unnecessary. I added the link and just accepted it. Ottava Rima (talk) 19:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

No reactions to the disappearance
Nothing about any public reaction at the time (or private reactions), theories, police involvement, etc. One might get the impression that nobody really cared, in which case, why is there a Wikipedia article on it now? --71.162.91.154 (talk) 06:37, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Because it is notable. Paintings disappear. There is no reaction to it. Blake was ignored for the most part while he was alive. It wasn't until the 60s that he became a major figure. Ottava Rima (talk) 15:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

The figure Los
Hi. I'm work at the spanish version of this article, and I can't found the meaning of the word 'Los' at the next sentence: "The figure of time appears in other works by Blake, including as the figure Los and in the illustration Blake made for Edward Young's Night Thoughts.". Can somebody help me? (Sorry for the bad english) --Giliofelix (talk) 16:25, 17 December 2013 (UTC)