Talk:A and B Loop/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk · contribs) 20:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.


 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Pass
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Pass
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Lead

 * I recommend bypassing the redirect and wikilinking Rose Quarter and Oregon Health & Science University instead through either a pipe link or directly
 * Done.

Opening and closing of the loop

 * Reference #38 says Project officials say they are confident the line will open by its new date, Sept. 21, 2012. but the line it is sourcing says The 3.3-mile (5.3 km) eastside extension opened on September 22, 2012.
 * I've added a second ref; the correct date is September 22. Keeping that existing one for the "five-month delay" piece.


 * Reference #39 doesn't really show they renamed the original service the "North South Line" (NS Line). I guess it's okay but a better reference is preferable
 * Replaced ref.

Thank you very much for taking on this review. I believe I have addressed all of your points. Stay safe! --truflip99 (talk) 07:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)