Talk:Aaditya Thackeray

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Adithya thakare.jpg

is this editable
editable page? Justiceforssr (talk) 12:03, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , It has been put under semi-protection due to repeated violations of Wikipedia's biography of living persons policy. If you don't meet the criteria to edit the article, you can leave an edit-request here on the talk page, clicking on the "View Source" tab on the article helps you with creating an edit request.  Ravensfire  (talk) 12:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

thanks! Justiceforssr (talk) 09:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Controversy
A man was booked for calling Aditya Thakeray Baby Penguin.

Adtya Thackeray denied the allegations of involved in the murder of Sushant Singh Rajput. Many ministers of his party had to support him for having no connection in the murder. Sanjay Raut even threatened that whoever will make allegations will need to pay a heavy price. Narayan Rane claimed that the ex manager of Sushant Singh Rajput, Disha Salian was raped and murdered. But Aditya Thakery mentioned that he will not anything which will ruin the name of Maharashtra. Udhhav Thakery chaired a meeting on the case. Uddhav Thakery asked for the proof for murder of Sushant Singh Rajput so he will punish the guilty. Sushant Singh Rajput's family's lawyer said this statement of Chief Minister that he does not know the law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghost of Sushant (talk • contribs) 14:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)


 * , At this point, what would apply to this article just a couple of those sentences, and those are basically tabloid fluff. That's not something that belongs in Wikipedia - A accuses B, A denies.  No charges on A.  Right now, it's basically tabloid fluff which doesn't belong on Wikipedia.  WP:NOTNEWS.  Ravensfire  (talk) 20:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring by User:Scainder
is violating WP:EDITWAR, removing sourced content without consensus. He has been warned at User talk:Scainder. NedFausa (talk) 21:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Aarey issue
Nedfusa Aarey issue was well referenced why did you remove it?? Scainder (talk) 18:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Per Wikipedia's roster of perennial sources, The Times of India is considered to have a reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable. Accordingly, your use of this source requires consensus. Please allow other editors to respond. NedFausa (talk) 18:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Which sources would work?? NDTV?? Please guide Scainder (talk) 19:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * As far as I know, NDTV is considered a reliable source. NedFausa (talk) 19:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Controversy
Emotional fans of Sushant Singh got fooled by fake narratives and were set to believe that Thackeray played a role in his death. He was targeted badly by trolls on social media. This allegation over him didn't hold much weight and not an ounce of proof was found of his involvement. People claiming to have proofs against him were never able to prove anything and were initially found to be lying to get media attention and take political revenge. AnamShha (talk) 14:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * That's irrelevant here. Your edits blatantly violate Wikipedia's neutrality policies; the article never states that the conspiracy theories are true, only that he's been included in conspiracy theories. Whether those conspiracy theories are correct or incorrect has no bearing to you blanking large sections of the article and adding non-neutral, unencyclopedic, uncited, and borderline defamatory content in place of said sections. Builder018 (talk) 15:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)