Talk:Aaron Seltzer

Article Tone
"He is not very good at his job." This doesn't sound very encyclopedic. Can someone rephrase that? --81.244.104.147 (talk) 13:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Grace Period for Vandalism
When this page has been defaced, please allow for a one hour grace period before reverting to a previous version. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.245.48.98 (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Nonsense! I say: In that case it shall remain defaced! Forever.--84.175.201.4 (talk) 17:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I vandalised it. Maybe its for my own good if they block me from editing on wikipedia...because I don't think I'll ever stop hating Aaron Seltzer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.176.55.228 (talk) 09:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Disgraced? I think not. To say he is a talentless hack is not opinion, but purely factual information. Proof of case? See: Meet the Spartans —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.125.254.5 (talk) 23:41, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Addressing Friedberg and Seltzer's negative reputation
It is an opinion when someone says that Friedberg and Seltzer "are talentless hacks." But it is a pure objective fact when someone says that Friedberg and Seltzer "are considered talentlesss hacks by virtually all movie critics and the majority of moviegoers." If you're that obsessed with backing it up with sources, you can cite the rankings of their movies on sites like IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes. -- drumwolf (not a registered Wikipedia account) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.150.8.10 (talk) 19:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)