Talk:Abba Seraphim

Name
As the British Orthodox Church calls him Abba Seraphim, this article should. Doug Weller (talk) 16:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

It would be useful to note how correctly to address a salutation to His Beatitude. Geoffrey BH 19:42, 28 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeoffreyBH (talk • contribs)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:51, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * William Henry Hugo Newman-Norton Escutcheon.png

Requested move 18 January 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: No consensus.  EdJohnston (talk) 02:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Abba Seraphim → William Newman-Norton – The article name should be William's Christian name and not his job title, in line with other similar pages, e.g. his uncle Hugh Newman. I am not sure why it was named like this in the first place - it is very strange and unusual. It is a bit like calling an article about Justin Welby the Archbishop of Canterbury instead. LRB2000 (talk) 22:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment : @LRB2000 Well, it seems to be the most WP:COMMONNAME (unless proven otherwise). This is not something unusual on WP to not have the article be the person's birth name : for example Joseph Ratzinger is called Benedict XVI, same goes for many other religious leaders like Irinej, Serbian Patriarch, and even for non-religious people like Afeni Shakur. Veverve (talk) 01:02, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose per COMMONNAME, for example useage here.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:32, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.