Talk:Abbott v. Abbott

NPOV Dispute - section "History"
This section of the article clearly violates Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy in a number of ways. In particular it contains a variety of claims without substantiation nor citation, and which have nothing to do with the US Supreme Court case the article is intended to describe. In no way could this be described as unbiased editorship. D435fg (talk) 21:52, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I have similar problems with the section and removed the uncited parts. Some of it still may be relevant (if the father abducted his child indeed -I suppose an article on the judgement can be found in a reliable source- and the observatory handed out visa (as it said) ec), but should only be added with sources. We should take extra care (on both sides) as it regards living persons... L.tak (talk) 18:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Abbott v. Abbott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120218030634/http://articles.cnn.com/2012-02-14/us/us_scotus-child-custody_1_custody-fight-federal-courts-child-abduction?_s=PM:US to http://articles.cnn.com/2012-02-14/us/us_scotus-child-custody_1_custody-fight-federal-courts-child-abduction?_s=PM:US

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:23, 2 October 2016 (UTC)