Talk:Abdallah bin Bayyah

On a general read, this article seems to be somewhat biased against the man, what with labelling his teachings 'deviant' and all. I don't know what minority fisq is so I will leave it for someone else to edit BelalHaniffa (talk) 08:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

6 years ago the above editor claimed the article was biased against this man labeling his ideas deviant (from the point of view of Islam, they actually are). this article has now clearly swung the other way with overly praising him and giving a positive bias towards the text without any criticism at all, of which i assure you there is much from mainstream Muslims, anyway i am going to a minor edit to remove the effusive praise while keeping the facts the same — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.35.165.122 (talk) 13:42, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on Abdallah Bin Bayyah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130127201220/http://www.iumsonline.net:80/ar/default.asp?MenuID=3 to http://www.iumsonline.net/ar/default.asp?MenuID=3
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140821133545/http://www.elkhabar.com/ar/nas/354962.html to http://www.elkhabar.com/ar/nas/354962.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130812082748/http://www.e-cfr.org:80/ar/index.php?ArticleID=245 to http://www.e-cfr.org/ar/index.php?ArticleID=245
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070304001601/http://web.mac.com:80/jawziyyah/iWeb/The%20Jawziyyah%20Institute/With%20The%20Shaykh.html to http://web.mac.com/jawziyyah/iWeb/The%20Jawziyyah%20Institute/With%20The%20Shaykh.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:11, 2 October 2016 (UTC)