Talk:Abdel Ghalib Ahmad Hakim

prod?
I left a note on the talk page of the person who left a prod on this article. I had questions about their use of WP:COATRACK as a justification for deletion.

I pointed out that it was just an essay.

I questioned the value of simply stating COATRACK when the essay doesn't encourage deletion, except

I stated the opinion that there was no discussion, here on the talk page, to show anyone had suggested this was an extreme case.

That user responded that wikipedians were entitled to nominate articles for deletion for any reason, citing: WP:PROD and WP:DEL. They addied:

I hope that they will return here and offer a more helpful description of their ocncern(s). In particular I hope they can explain what triggered their soapbox comment.

Cheers! Geo Swan 19:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

responsible use of tags...
Someone placed an npov tag on this article. That tag, when instantiated, tells readers to look at the talk pag for an explanation for the tag. But the individual who placed this tag did not leave an explanation.

I am going to wait a reasonable amount of time, and then remove the abandoned tag. Geo Swan (talk) 18:56, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * removed. Geo Swan (talk) 20:33, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

rough work
These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors. Geo Swan (talk) 20:31, 6 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Another useful link is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Abdel Ghalib Ahmad Hakim. IQinn (talk) 10:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)