Talk:Abdul Gaffar Billoo

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on Abdul Gaffar Billoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921054838/http://www.aku.edu/collegesschoolsandinstitutes/medicine/pakistan/Faculty/Pages/Abdul_Gaffar_Billoo.aspx to http://www.aku.edu/collegesschoolsandinstitutes/medicine/pakistan/Faculty/Pages/Abdul_Gaffar_Billoo.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921220606/http://www.schildnews.com/gbillo/ to http://www.schildnews.com/gbillo
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921054843/http://hospitals.aku.edu/karachi/Pages/physiciandetails.aspx?Mnemonics=GBIL&Name=GAFFAR%20BILLOO&letter=G&speciality=&location=&gender&keyword=&profile=1 to http://hospitals.aku.edu/karachi/Pages/physiciandetails.aspx?Mnemonics=GBIL&Name=GAFFAR%20BILLOO&letter=G&speciality=&location=&gender&keyword=&profile=1
 * Added tag to http://applications.emro.who.int/library/Databases/wxis.exe/Library/Databases/iah/?IsisScript=iah/iah.xic&base=imemr&form=A&user=guest&lang=i&nextAction=search&indexSearch=
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921054709/http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-4-155642-Child-marriages-most-prevalent-in-Sindh-moot-told to http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-4-155642-Child-marriages-most-prevalent-in-Sindh-moot-told

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Rating changes
I just reverted the changes made by, as this is nowhere close to an A-class article; furthermore, A-class isn't even used by WikiProject Med. I also reverted the increased importance as, again, he does not appear to be high-importance to WPM. I don't believe he should be rated high-importance for Pakistan either, based on other members of Category:High-importance Pakistan articles, but I'll leave that for another editor with more expertise in Pakistani affairs. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 13:50, 26 April 2018 (UTC)