Talk:Abdul Ghafoor Khan Durrani

This Article is not about Senator Anwar Khan Durrani
Dear all wiki editors this article is about Abdul Ghafoor Khan Durrani, it is not about Mr. Anwar Khan Durrani (Senator) late. I agree that Mr. Senator was one of the respectable and closest family member of Mr. Ghfoor Khan Durrani, therefor I am going to creat a new article page about Mr. Anwar Khan Durrani Senator, I request all to please improve the article about anwar khan durrani--Baloch Warrior 22:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baloch Baba (talk • contribs) Please improve article Mohammad Anwar Khan Durrani -- 23:18, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Appearance of High-jacked Page
On 23rd June I recovered the Highjacked page of late Abdul Ghafoor Khan Durrani and fixed the citations tag and edited the page by cleaning the article from unnecessary family members, and I also created New page of Mohammad Anwar Khan Durranifor whom this Article was High-jacked, hopefully this may be clean again as I did,--Baloch Warrior (talk) 00:16, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Abdul Ghafoor Khan Durrani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://gjtmap-balochistan.org/html/quetta_instutional_history.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080726190710/http://www.app.com.pk/en/pdf/balochistan.pdf to http://app.com.pk/en/pdf/balochistan.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:06, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * A. Ghafoor Khan Durrani Qta.jpg

Restoration of deleted information is required of this page
some authentic information of thhis page has been deleted which is required to be restored. (101.53.244.100 (talk) 12:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC))

Thanks for guidance
Hello and thanks for the guidance, I understand the Wikipedia guidelines with less experience, in-connection with editing and restoration of original contents of the article of Abdul Ghafoor Khan Durrani you as a good Wikipedia Editor must help to improve the article instead deletion of the available information from the article again and again, so your help is required for improvement of the article in question, Profound Regards and Stay Blessed.(101.53.244.100 (talk) 11:21, 28 December 2020 (UTC)).
 * My dear friend 101.53.244.100, hello and thanks for writing. The problem is that, regardless of whether information is true or not, it should not be added to an article unless it is notable and adequately referenced. In particular, Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. According to according to the WP:BURDEN policy, the person who adds information is the one responsible for providing evidence. This burden of responsibility isn’t transferable to other editors. You will notice from the template at the top of the page that the Abdul Ghafoor Khan Durrani article has lacked sufficient sources for 11 years. So removing poorly referenced or unreferenced information from it is a proper thing for an editor to do. I hope this helps. Best regards, George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 12:03, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

somtime template at the top of the page are laying forgotten for many years instead provides of resalable source and others follow the template instead removing it, hence-fore you are again requested to please help me in improvement and restoration of the article said above, So removing poorly referenced or unreferenced information from it without research and confirmation is injustice thing for an editor to do, The best way to improve the article please remove the template in question for smooth improvement of the article, Abdul Ghafoor Khan Durrani Best Regards and Stay Happy.(101.53.244.100 (talk) 12:59, 28 December 2020 (UTC)).
 * Hi Dear Friend, once again thanks a lot for the remarkable updates,
 * Dear friend 101.53.244.100, please try to learn how Wikipedia actually works. Your comment about templates is incorrect. Moreover, it’s not my responsibility to add information and/or citations to this or any other page. Please read the WP:BURDEN policy, which explains that responsibility for providing citations rests with the person who adds the information. Best regards, George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 13:11, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Stay Blessed and wish you all the Best, (101.53.244.100 (talk) 12:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)).
 * Dear Friend George Sabre George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) I understand how Wikipedia actually works with my less experience, So I also understand that responsibility for deleting and removing is last option for Wiki Editors but improvement of articles are priority to them, I requested for help for Improvement of article of Abdul Ghafoor Khan Durrani so no problem the choice is your,

Editors Help Requested
Above are the discussion held between me and George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) for the improvement of article Abdul Ghafoor Khan Durrani is placed here for the information of respected Wikipedia Editor, He has been also deleted and removed my edits made in the articles of Palay Khan ‎Jamal Shah Dur Mohammad Kassi and others I dont understand about the work of this Wikipedia Editor he only removes the matters from the articles instead of improvement of the articles,(101.53.244.100 (talk) 15:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)).


 * You, not me, are obliged to provide evidence when you add information. Any editor can remove unreferenced information without being obliged, as you seem to demand, to “improve” the page. The WP:BURDEN guidelines are clear about this. They say: “All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution.” Best regards, George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 15:56, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

I have checked and gone through the record of your Edit Contributions and I found your contribution 94 1% based on reverting and deleting the contents of Wikipedia Volunteers deliberately just to show your self as a superior editor and nothing else, for example you had reverted the Photograph of in the article of Dur Mohammad Kassi with the remarks that you will show how this pic came, I show you that how this pic has been provided to net, this Photograph is soul property of Prof:- PHD Haji akhtar Muhammad kassi brother of haji dur Muhammad kassi who released it From the personal collections of photographs of Dur Muhammad Kassi for public & Common use 09-02-2010, and this was published in [] on Tuesday, March 01, 2011 with permission of Prof:- PHD Haji akhtar Muhammad kassi brother of haji dur Muhammad kassi, In the light of above facts you are once again requested to please refrain from my constructive edits by making unnecessary reverts,
 * You are the only Wikipedia editor who revert Constructive edits of worthy Volunteers Wikipedia Editors without making sense of Notability, You impose only one law of Wikipedia instead following the Wikipedia laws allowing Volunteers wikipidians editors for making constructive edits in articles,

I Wish you the Best and Happy New Year 2021 few hours in advance, (101.53.244.100 (talk) 13:42, 31 December 2020 (UTC)).
 * That is nonsense. Assume good faith (click the link to read the Wikipedia guideline) and refrain from personal attack or accusations. I have the right as an editor to remove unreferenced information and copy edit badly written text. That’s called copy editing. I edit professionally and without an agenda. George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 14:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Please no abusing language and refrain from personal attack Assume good faith (click the link to read the Wikipedia guideline) Every Constructive edit looks to you nonsense because I just show your edit history that what you are doing with the articles only Revereting the edits of Wikipedia Volunteers I have not seen any progressive change in your edits for the betterment and improvement of an article except few ones which are on your agenda, I have no personal attacked on you instead you did on me else-here I wished you Happy New Year in advance, please be positive like other thousands of Wikipedia editors and come out from negative thinking, the world is full of professional and progressive Wiki editors who make positive and constructive edits for the development of articles,

You must be sorry for uncivilized language, Happy Editing, (101.53.244.100 (talk) 15:14, 31 December 2020 (UTC)). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.53.244.101 (talk)