Talk:Abdul Muneem Patel

Untitled
This article is pointless, mr patel has not been charged and the article should be deleted —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.170.31.63 (talk • contribs). 'Patel’s character apparently changed ago (sic) when his mechanic father Mohammed, went to Iraq on a Muslim aid mission and never came back.' This is libel and a fabrication, it is known that the source of this information has a grudge against Mr Patel. Furthermore, if you listen carefully to the charges, he is not actually charged in connection to the alleged plot.
 * I have nominated it for an AFD. I agree that two lines of semi-sentences should not be an article. --Irishpunktom\talk 11:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Whoever keeps putting this article is breaching Patel's legal rights. Why exactly do you think this article needs to be put up at all? Reckon you're serving some kind of public need? Or do you have some sort of vendetta? There is a word for people like you. GHOUL. Let's just hope that you are never in such a position yourself, where your fellow ghouls can write slanderous articles about you. Wikipedia is supposed to be an authentic source of information, but it seems you are determined to put up any tat you can find to sully Patel's character, with no attempt to verify. So 'he was expelled from the secondary school at the age of 15 or 16 for skipping classes.'?? Really? Why not actually go and ask his classmates who will verify that this is FALSE! You should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself.Maliki-sis 16:51, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Right listen. Mr Patel is under 18. He is a minor. He is not allowed to be named. Do you understand this? You are setting up wikipedia for a visit from his lawyer!!!!


 * Just wanted to add: 'Encyclopedic content must be verifiable.' Sensationalist tabloid reports do not count! Again, please remember you are breaching the law by naming him. Maliki-sis 16:54, 23 August 2006 (UTC)