Talk:Abdul Razak Baginda

Untitled
I still think his name should be abbreviated as "Abdul Razak" rather than "Baginda". Even if "Baginda" is his nickname in this particular case, the mainstream media always call him Abdul Razak, and calling him Baginda contributes to the misunderstanding that Westerners have, thinking that the Malay patronymic is actually a surname. Just for the sake of clarity and consistency. 66.188.104.173 (talk) 13:40, 30 May 2008 (UTC) Xenobiologista

Legion d'Honneur
Source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.208.207.133 (talk) 08:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:38, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

DCNS and Altantuyaa Case
Bringing this here since the section is being raised for deletion. Note that just because the subject was acquitted, does not automatically mean that the whole section should be deleted. If that were the case, the OJ Simpson article would not contain any mention about his wife's murder case, nor Amanda Knox's article contain information about Meredith Kercher's murder, even though both of them was eventually acquitted. Our role is not to question/verify the claims/truth of the trial, but to include a NPOV writeup about the case that he had been strongly associated with (since he was the prime suspect). I've provided additional sources including Yahoo, The New Paper, and ABC Radio Australia so reliable sourcing should no longer be an issue. Regarding the point that the evidence was denied by the Malaysian Government, please do include that point in the article as well. Zhanzhao (talk) 13:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

UPDATE: I've trimmed the section to only leave the parts that the subject is directly involved in, and added more international references so it should be more balanced (previously it was over-reliant on Malaysia Insider and FreeMalaysiaToday articles). Zhanzhao (talk) 20:54, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Abdul Razak Baginda. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.vancouversun.com/business/Malaysian+prime+minister+faces+allegations+over+submarine/7706875/story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 11:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)