Talk:Abhishek Malhan

Issues
Hi @Columbidae5, this article doesn't seem to have a NPOV and is slanted towards recent events due to the following reasons- Leoneix (talk) 04:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * primarily focuses on Malhan's accomplishments and positive qualities, highlighting his participation in popular reality shows and drawing inspiration from established YouTubers.
 * usage of positive language to describe Abhishek Malhan, using words like "known" and "emerged".
 * allegations are mentioned at the end of the article, after establishing a positive image, this minimizes the impact of these claims
 * the article does not provide much context about Malhan's early career or his work on YouTube before he participated in Bigg Boss OTT and Temptation Island India.
 * using words like "fandom war" presents the conflict in a way that is relevant to social media.


 * noted all the issues, working on them. Thanks @Leoneix for highlighting these to create wikipedia a neutral database for readers. Columbidae5 (talk) 10:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Columbidae5 If you wish you can take a look at the articles of other social media personalities for an idea. Reach out to me for any assistance. Leoneix (talk) 10:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Columbidae5 Let me point out another thing. Avoid citing too many sources. See WP:TOOMANYREFS Leoneix (talk) 15:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay got it, @Leoneix Thank you for helping. Columbidae5 (talk) 16:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Columbidae5, You can remove the controversies sections and merge it with the career section per WP:CRITS Leoneix (talk) 04:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, @Leoneix could you remove the neutrality template from the page now if you think this is not a case now. Columbidae5 (talk) 09:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Columbidae5 the article has been significantly improved. A bit more improvement would make it better. Here are few issues that I noticed.
 * the article claims that Abhishek Malhan is "inspired by Mr. Beast and KSI," but this claim is not cited.
 * article currently has a lot of references attached, which can make it difficult to read. Consider reducing the number of references by only linking to the most important and relevant articles.
 * Leoneix (talk) 10:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Leoneix, I have cited the inpiration thing and working on reducing the references. Thank you for guiding me on each step. Columbidae5 (talk) 10:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry my bad, I didn't notice it. Leoneix (talk) 10:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Leoneix can you help me to stop @Ramahare, he is trying to make the article worse. Columbidae5 (talk) 11:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Columbidae5, please remove the template that I have added after the completion of your edits. It should not be kept for too long. Leoneix (talk) 18:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay @Leoneix, understood Columbidae5 (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The Career section doesn't seem to have a NPOV anymore. Avoid making useless sub sections, separating the paragraph in parts does the job Leoneix (talk) 19:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay Columbidae5 (talk) 10:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Requesting change in controversies
in the above mentioned controversies, mainly in Lord Ganesha Controversy I request you to add his reply points also as it is half and seems manipulating and creating his image negative in the mind of readers.His point in reply was that it is very old tik tok video where he made this video to bring change in society as it was in trend most of the youngsters were doing it like that he made to highlight and make it correct but some of his haters tried to manipulate public by showing that old tik tok video and tried to show his image as an anti Hindu. 2409:4089:809E:5F79:0:0:633:48A5 (talk) 02:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Okay, I have done it Columbidae5 (talk) 09:56, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Rfc
Comments on the notability of the subject in this BLP article. Leoneix (talk) 15:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * This RFC is unnecessary. If anyone thinks this person is not notable, they should open an WP:AFD discussion explaining why. Iffy★Chat -- 18:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * RfC should be procedurally closed. Take it to AfD if you think the subject of this BLP is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. This is not what RfCs are intended for, which is generally for specific content disputes/issues. Isaidnoway (talk) 🍁 19:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Needs to be procedurally closed. Per above, if notability is questioned it should be brought to AFD. Also, RFC's are used more and more for mundane issues but "editors should try to resolve their issues before starting an RfC". --  Otr500 (talk) 21:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)