Talk:Abortion/FAQ


 * 1) Should we add or expand coverage of a particular aspect of abortion?
 * It is likely that we have already done so. There was so much information on abortion that we decided to split it all into separate articles. This article is concise because we've tried to create an overview of the entire topic here by summarizing many of these more-detailed articles. The goal is to give readers the ability to pick the level of detail that best suits their needs. If you're looking for more detail, check out some of the other articles related to abortion.
 * 1) This article seems to be on the long side. Should we shorten it?
 * See above. The guidelines on article length contain exceptions for articles which act as "starting points" for "broad subjects." Please see the archived discussion "Article Length."
 * 1) Should we include expert medical or legal advice about abortions?
 * No. Wikipedia does not give legal or medical advice. Please see Medical disclaimer and Legal disclaimer for more information.
 * 1) Should we include or link to pictures of fetuses and/or the end products of abortion?
 * No consensus. See the huge discussion on this topic in 2009 here. Consistently, there has been little support for graphic "shock images"; while images were added in 2009 the topic remains contentious, and some images have been removed.
 * 1) Should we include an image in the lead?
 * No consensus. Numerous images have been proposed for the article lead. However, no image achieved consensus and the proposal that garnered a majority of support is to explicitly have no image in the lead.
 * 1) Should we mention the "death of the zygote/embryo/fetus/child/etc." ?
 * No - It is not mentioned because it is well known and understood by everyone that this happens. To explicitly mention it is POV of anti-abortionists. No one believes that in an abortion procedure the embryo will be transplanted to another woman's uterus or transferred to an artificial placenta so that it can then gestate to term and be birthed.
 * 1) Are the terms "safe" and "safety" used correctly in this article?
 * Yes - please see this RfC on the topic.