Talk:Above the Law (website)

Re: deletion
I don't think there's enough material here for this subject to qualify as notable, under the protocol established by WP:WEB  The Washington Post reference to Above the Law is parenthetical, and provides very little information on the blog. The award from the ABA journal is not well known, and looks like it was based on a web poll. It also is unclear whether the ABA still gives out this award or if it was a one time thing. I'm going to mark the page with the Proposed Deletion tag for now. If you can find notable independent sources for the article, please remove the tag. Thomrenault (talk) 21:33, 22 April 2011 (UTC) Chill out yo. This be the number one blog for the legal peoples. Google search and you be seing it mentioned in thousands of articles and shit. --Yardsspan 06:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I google searched and saw it mentioned in a lot of blogs. I followed the link you added as a reference, but it doesn't lead to an article about this blog.  Maybe you could save me the trouble of digging through all those blogs on google by providing a link to some articles about this blog written by reliable sources, so we'll know that it meets the notability criteria?  Thanks. -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Where's the article on the concept?
I'm looking for an article on the concept of being above the law. Like, some people have various forms of legal immunity, making them above certain aspects of the law (judges, for example, are above civil law, in the sense that anything they do in their line of work is not a tort, due to judicial immunity). Can someone help me find the article on that? It wasn't on the disambiguation page.Wikieditor1988 (talk) 07:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * See the dab page now. (Although I'm curious whether the reference will get deleted out of people's concern about relevance. --Dpr (talk) 23:43, 23 October 2009 (UTC)