Talk:Abraham Lincoln's second inaugural address/Archive 1

Primary Source?
Wikipedia is not a primary source according to WP:NOT, and should not, in my opinion, quote the actual text from the speech. I am not saying it should be removed since it could be useful, but perhaps it could be, and an external link could be placed with a reference near the top. What do you think? 98.19.149.253 (talk) 02:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Actually, what if it was put into WikiSource, like is done for Gettysburg Address? 98.19.149.253 (talk) 02:58, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, I have done so (I am the same as the person above). There was no opposition, but I assume since it was done for the Gettysburg Address page, consensus will have been reached there, and I can use that as a precedent for this change. 98.23.18.53 (talk) 08:44, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Neutrality disputed???
Why is the neutrality of this article under dispute? I don't get it. I saw the tag just today, and noticed it had been posted by an auto-bot a few days ago&mdash;but why? I understand the tag that says more sources are needed, but not the one about neutrality, especially since nothing was posted to the talk page. Can anyone shed some light on this subject, please? Thanks! - Ecjmartin (talk) 17:15, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Since no one has come forward to explain why the NPOV tag was placed on this article, and/or to recommend appropriate changes (if any are even needed), I am removing the NPOV tag (which was placed by an auto-bot to begin with). - Ecjmartin (talk) 21:42, 13 June 2013 (UTQ)