Talk:Acacia victoriae

Writerhound, what happened with the editing? It looks like the article was fine up to when the psychoactive references and incorrect binomal name were added ie A.tenuifolia. I think such a major edit to an article should involve some discussion in this discussion page prior to the event. It was previously a well and authoritively referenced article and provided good information. Why did you wreck it in the first place? John Moss.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Acacia victoriae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120316050954/http://arboretum.arizona.edu:80/taxa/Acacia_victoriae.html to http://arboretum.arizona.edu/taxa/Acacia_victoriae.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:36, 3 October 2016 (UTC)