Talk:Academic imperialism

Untitled
So ... its a short, mostly-opinion page summarizing exactly one sociology article published eleven years ago. It has been cited 21 times since then http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Publication/44575724/academic-dependency-and-the-global-division-of-labour-in-the-social-sciences

There are many, many single sociology papers of more significance than this. There are a ton of science papers more significant than this. How does one nominate this for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crispincowan (talk • contribs) 02:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The fact that the article currently has shortcomings does not equals that the topic it covers is irrelavant. I see no valid argument for irrelevancy. There are plenty of sources and google academic searches gives shows a wide usage of the term. Sietecolores (talk) 02:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

The fact that the paper was published 11 years ago and has only 21 citations in that time is an affirmative proof that it **is** irrelevant and trivial. If it was of any significance, it would have been cited more often than that. Crispincowan (talk) 07:56, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Academic imperialism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140201234147/http://www.artsrn.ualberta.ca/courses/PoliticalScience/357B1/documents/AlatasAcademicDependencyandGlobalDivisionLabourSocSci.pdf to http://www.artsrn.ualberta.ca/courses/PoliticalScience/357B1/documents/AlatasAcademicDependencyandGlobalDivisionLabourSocSci.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)