Talk:Academic ranks (Australia and New Zealand)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Academic ranks (Australia and New Zealand). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150109032701/http://www.canberra.edu.au/hr/attachments/workplace-relations/ea-information/UC-EA-2013-2015.pdf to http://www.canberra.edu.au/hr/attachments/workplace-relations/ea-information/UC-EA-2013-2015.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Non-employee rank descriptors inadequately defined
Wotcher,

As we all know the non-employee ranks are a f^w joke. However, there is a semantic purpose behind the distinctions between visiting, adjunct, conjoint, honorary, and emeritus and the other ones I've forgotten having been out for long enough. Basically: At least that's the way I remember advising my head of school (which was actually either a minifaculty or a horribly perverted department) on how to appoint people correctly. Fifelfoo (talk) 06:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Visiting : We gave 'em library access, they're substantive elsewhere
 * Adjunct : We don't quite trust 'em, they work for a living somewhere. Like an engineer working for a Car firm.
 * Conjoint : They have a substantive wherein they *can* research, for example a hospital doctor, but they *also* research with us.
 * Honorary : They are a bus-driver but f^w me that one book they published.
 * Emeritus : THEY JUST WON'T RETIRE.