Talk:Acceptable loss

Untitled
Suggest that the armed services, not to mention religious organizations, are poor examples of businesses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.172.24.113 (talk) 16:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, the article was weirdly written with a odd religious slant. In general, it did not really know what it wanted to be about. Also it used rather unreliable web sources (blogs etc). Thus I decided it was easier to do a complete rewrite than fix all the problems individually. --Gemena (talk) 18:12, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Acceptable loss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161105133639/https://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/82192134-8122-404a-a139-2fcc2de2fe38/Casualty-Aversion-Myth%2C-The---Lacquement%2C-Richard-.aspx to https://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/82192134-8122-404a-a139-2fcc2de2fe38/Casualty-Aversion-Myth%2C-The---Lacquement%2C-Richard-.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130711222335/http://www.aim.com.au/DisplayStory.asp?ID=875 to http://www.aim.com.au/DisplayStory.asp?ID=875
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140111023741/http://www.rjg.com/acceptablelosses.html to http://www.rjg.com/acceptablelosses.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)