Talk:Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co.

The implications section seems to be giving someone's personal analyses and arguments. It's not what I expect when I read a Wikipedia article. Sorry, I can't point to any Wikipedia policy on it, but it just doesn't seem right and that it should be removed or have some external references or expert opinions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.12.195.73 (talk) 18:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Access Now, Inc
The article doesn't mention the plaintiff, Access Now, Inc (not to be confused with accessnow.org). I can't find much about them right now, but their website is --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713142308/http://www.kellyandlemmons.com/CM/NewsArticles/AmericanwithDisabilitiesAct.asp to http://www.kellyandlemmons.com/CM/NewsArticles/AmericanwithDisabilitiesAct.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)