Talk:Accounting Today

Don't see the problem
I really don't see the problem with this page. I'd be happy to modify it but "Multiple issues" is rather vague. It's short. Concise. Completely neutral. The tags all look good. It's definitely notable. What am I missing? --Cpatechnut (talk) 17:04, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi! Thanks for the note. In WP's nomenclature, "multiple issues" is just a way to indicate that it's been tagged with more than one problem template (cleanup and in-line references).  Primarily what you need to do is use the references you have at the bottom of the page and use them to source the article inside the text of the article.  For instance, there's an assertion about the publication's circulation.  While that information may be supported inside one of the references at the bottom, Wikipedia's preferred style is for you to insert an in-line reference link at the point where an assertion of fact is made (this will insert a footnote basically).  For more information on how to do this browse through WP:CITE.  Thanks again.  &mdash; e. ripley\talk 17:13, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Done. Thanks E. Ripley. --Cpatechnut (talk) 19:27, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accounting Today. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100128025054/http://solutions.sourcemedia.com/our_audience.html to http://solutions.sourcemedia.com/our_audience.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:24, 25 June 2017 (UTC)