Talk:Accounting research

Peer review
Should we subject this article to peer review?Lbertolotti (talk) 15:07, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accounting research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131227111624/http://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-technical/human-capital/rr-120-002.pdf to http://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-technical/human-capital/rr-120-002.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Missing streams of accounting research
This article is well written but it neglects significant research streams in accounting, particularly those that are more common outside of the United States. This includes critical, sociological, behavioural, and historical approaches to accounting research. There are numerous reputable academic journals for this research, such as Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Behavioural Research in Accounting, and Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

I will be making an effort over the coming months to update the article to reflect these other areas of research. If you have any suggestions to make, or comments on my edits, I would be delighted to talk here.

BoneClock (talk) 11:33, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

The list of topical areas in this article is particularly problematic. The article cited arrives at its categories by definition (see page 643) rather than by deriving them empirically. I'll be looking for a better reference. If anyone has a suggestion, please leave it here.

BoneClock (talk) 21:48, 5 November 2018 (UTC)