Talk:Accrediting Agency of Chartered Colleges and Universities in the Philippines

Revision

 * The portion which was said to be violating some copyright rules has been revised and modified. Sources used for the article were also cited. ~Jcmpineda (talk)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the previous article which was directly copied from the organization's website was fully revised. It is almost totally different from the previous version. However, sentences which are exported from the said website were given citations. -- 12:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the previous article which was directly copied from the organization's website was fully revised. It is almost totally different from the previous version. However, sentences which are exported from the said website were given citations. 12:56, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I restored the detection bot's notice and added the speedy deletion because it appears that there is still significant similarity to indicate a possible continuing copyright violation. It had reduced a little since the bot first tagged the article, but I believe there is still some legitimate concern.  At this point, I feel it requires an administrator to review the status and make the appropriate decision.  Even if the copyright violation was completely solved, administrator attention would still be required to hide the infringing revisions from public view.  The reviewing administrator will consider what you have said on this talk page, as a standard part of processing the deletion nomination.  Please note that signing your posts as "wiki_editor" is somewhat frowned upon, as it makes communication unnecessarily difficult, so I have properly linked your posts to your username, WP:SIGPROB   Murph 9000  (talk) 13:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, I got it. Thank you for your concern by the way! ~ 18:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I've removed the speedy deletion notice because I think the article can be salvaged. Rewriting the lead section in your own words should be sufficient. Let me or Murph9000 know if you have any questions. larryv (talk) 17:57, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Er, forgot that the copyvio notice blanks the article. You can start editing the previous version . larryv (talk) 18:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, thank you! Is there any possibility that the article will be deleted? ~ 11:58, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.aaccupqa.org.ph/ or http://aaccup.url.ph/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)