Talk:Acorn Computers (2006)

This Company
This is a different company than acorn computers so i dont think the pages should be the same - Unknown
 * If this company were notable enough for an article then I would agree but considering the only notable thing they are listed for is buying and raping a trademark they don't deserve anything more than a footnote section in the article about the company that originally owned that trademark. Plugwash 23:11, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Too bad wikipedia doesn't have a category for wideboys,wankers&oxygen-thieves. 86.137.215.128 (talk) 21:06, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Amusingly it looks like they might be stuffed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.173.231 (talk) 01:05, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

I agree, this article should be a footnote  Gaogier How can I help? 18:08, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Acorn Computers (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928061314/http://www.blaptops.com/news/acorn-computers-reborn/ to http://www.blaptops.com/news/acorn-computers-reborn/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061013190558/http://www.ctshow.co.uk/cgi-events/exview.pl?exhibition_id=91&exbtr_id=6424 to http://www.ctshow.co.uk/cgi-events/exview.pl?exhibition_id=91&exbtr_id=6424
 * Added tag to http://wiki.onega.net/index.php?title=News#Acorns_at_Onega

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Did this company ever even ship anything?
If this company didn't even make it to market, I agree with the above; this is not notable enough for separate article. If no one can confirm that they ever shipped a product, I'll post a WP:PROD in a few days.--NapoliRoma (talk) 18:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

I have to agree that this company scarcely meets any real notability threshold. Maybe they deserve a paragraph in the actual Acorn Computers article in a section about what happened to Acorn after the 1999 acquisition. Then, the absurdly prominent notice at the top of that article alerting readers to this historical footnote can be removed. --PaulBoddie (talk) 22:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC)