Talk:Acrobat (U2 song)

Rapid Tremelo
To describe tremelo as "rapid" is redundant, considering that tremelo means "a rapid repetition of one note in music". It would be like saying "The Edge rapidly rapidly repeated a note." I thank you in advance for not reverting this grammatical correction. Wendel67 08:31, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I was not aware of that - thank you very much for pointing that out, my friend. MelicansMatkin 23:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Sound Sample?
Would it be possible to have a sample of the song uploaded? Kiwinil (talk) 05:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Acrobat (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/u2s_serious_fun

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 15:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Acrobat (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hotpress.com/archive/2613077.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boston.com/ae/music/packages/U2Fleetcenter/album_review_achtung_baby/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.nytimes.com/1991/11/17/arts/recordings-view-u2-takes-a-turn-from-the-universal-to-the-domestic.html?pagewanted=3&src=pm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0%2C%2C316330%2C00.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130215171748/http://news.qthemusic.com/2011/10/q_curates_cover_album_of_u2s_a.html to http://news.qthemusic.com/2011/10/q_curates_cover_album_of_u2s_a.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 1 November 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved.

4 editors support the move and none oppose, so I find consensus to move. Acrobat (Gwangil Jo song) was deprodded. (non-admin closure) Havelock Jones (talk) 14:58, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Acrobat (song) → Acrobat (U2 song) – To avoid confusion with Acrobat (Gwangil Jo song) Suhaengpyeongga (talk) 14:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. I've retargeted Acrobat (song) to Acrobat (disambiguation), as you left it as a redirect to Acrobat (U2 song), which would defeat the point of the move. This kind of cleanup should ideally be done by the closer right after moving. Lennart97 (talk) 23:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per WP:SONGDAB. 162 etc. (talk) 17:49, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per WP:SONGDAB. Aoba47 (talk) 18:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per WP:SONGDAB.--Ortizesp (talk) 02:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment The article about the Korean song is brand new and its notability seems poorly established. It hinges mostly the Korean Hip-hop Awards nomination, accompanied by comments from "hip hop fans" and "netizens"; on top of that, it did not chart and no significant coverage is cited (the Business Report article focuses on the artist and only mentions the song). It was proposed for deletion two days ago. So ideally I'd wait with the move until that article is stable and has established notability. I don't necessarily oppose the move, though, since as long as this article does exist, SONGDAB might as well be followed. Lennart97 (talk) 12:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)