Talk:Acrocyanosis

Benign vs. not-benign?
I don't see the reason for separate pages. They even include some of the same information. Perhaps simply including all the causes of acrocyanosis on one page, including a section on benign idiopathic acrocyanosis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.91.118.195 (talk • contribs) 05:09 UTC, 20 January 2009
 * Agreed, it should be merged. It's the same condition and they both could be explained on the same page. --IdLoveOne (talk) 19:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support as per nom. kilbad (talk) 16:31, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Done. As per this discussion and User_talk:Arcadian. ---kilbad (talk) 18:15, 29 April 2009 (UTC)