Talk:Across 110th Street/Archive 1

Comments
I came across this article and I was very disappointed. This reads like a capsule review of the film, using far too much praise and far too few facts. It says definitively that this is "not a Blaxploitation film," on what basis? What makes the dialogue so "intelligent?" It doesn't even mention the song from the movie.

I've never seen it so I can't really make any worthwhile edits. I hope someone familiar with the film can do something. --feitclub 19:31, July 16, 2005 (UTC)


 * I'm not familiar with this film at all, but its title caught my eye. For God's sake, someone clean it up.  It reads like a damn fan's review.  --Thorns Among Our Leaves 15:45, 20 July 2005 (UTC)


 * I've seen the film, and it has indeed earned critical praise over the years. I've given a cite to that effect, added the Womack song, and tried to clean up the article.  Accordingly I've taken off the NPOV tag.   Wasted Time R 12:38, 23 September 2005 (UTC)


 * I clean it up some. I'm uncomfortable w/ the section now entitled BACKGROUND.  Darn: NPOV and original work.  I did my bit. And it won't be on my WATCH list. And it's now 2008.  Luigibob (talk) 02:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

DVD cover
I replaced this DVD cover image with the original theatrical poster. (Ibaranoff24 18:09, 16 April 2006 (UTC))