Talk:Acrostic ring

PROD removed
PROD concern stated as "Appears to only rely on one or two sources, checked and I couldn't find anything else". A quick Google Books search shows sources available from 1913, 1971 , 1986 , 1998 , and 2015. I also find references in Australian newspapers from 1900 and 1933, and North American papers from eg 1899 , 1923 , 1936 , and 1968. RebeccaGreen (talk) 23:34, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Merger proposal
I propose to merge Regards ring into Dearest ring. I think that the content in the Regards ring article can easily be explained in the context of Dearest ring, and the Dearest ring article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Regards ring will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Pepper Beast   (talk)  17:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Support the idea of a merge. I suggest the joint page title of Acrostic ring, with Dearest and Regards becoming sections. Klbrain (talk) 17:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 22:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)