Talk:Act of state doctrine

Sabbatino incomplete
The holding in Sabbatino was that the Act of State applied even though Cuba's actions had violated international law; hence, the Doctrine applies to an act of a sovereign state done within its territory, even if the act violates international law. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.218.203.151 (talk) 17:49, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Lacks Citations
This article is in dire need of case cites and removal of loaded paraphrasing, such as the Second Hickenlooper instructs courts to apply the doctrine "[the Executive] tells them to." That sort of statement really needs a citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elreynolds04 (talk • contribs) 01:06, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:22, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Act of State doctrine → Act of state doctrine –

It's at halfway house at the moment. There is no reason to upcase, even if some lawyers upcase just about every law-relate noun. Per WP:CAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony  (talk)  11:54, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Support decapitalization, but I'm thinking it should probably be Act-of-state doctrine. That's how the term is listed in Black's Law Dictionary. Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Support. Though I agree with Good Ol'factory that it should probably be hyphenated, as well. Jenks24 (talk) 10:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Support decapitalisation but not hyphenation. I'm seeing quite a few legal sources omit hyphens, and I think properly so. --Mkativerata (talk) 07:25, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Act of state doctrine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070515005722/http://www.icj-cij.org/ to http://www.icj-cij.org/.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:41, 26 June 2017 (UTC)