Talk:Actaea racemosa

Footnotes 1-9 do not function properly, fix requested
On March 18, 2007, all footnotes were tested and seemed not to function, though the information could be seen in the edit view. A technically-adept person is requested to fix them so they work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.101.69.73 (talk) 20:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC).


 * Fixed. MidgleyDJ 20:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Latest Studies
A high quality study has shown positive effects for high quality extracts to treat menopausal women. Past inconsistent results due to poor quality control. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3767045/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adept21 (talk • contribs) 04:17, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Actaea racemosa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110303205921/http://www.altmedrev.com/searchamr.html to http://www.altmedrev.com/searchamr.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009063014/http://www.intellihealth.com/IH/ihtIH/WSSAN283/8513/31402/346466.html?d=dmtContent to http://www.intellihealth.com/IH/ihtIH/WSSAN283/8513/31402/346466.html?d=dmtContent

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:50, 26 June 2017 (UTC)