Talk:Action of 22 October 1793/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 00:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Its been eight days - can you let me know what needs doing?--Jackyd101 (talk) 20:23, 16 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Lead and infobox;
 * a lone British Royal Navy ship of the line; what is the need to mention "lone" because the counterpart also had only one ship.
 * They had more, made it clearer.


 * attacked the large French Navy frigate Melpomène off the coast of Sardinia; usage of "large", declaration of frigate gives the reader an idea about ship's size, I don't think a specific mention is needed.
 * I've moved it so its clearer, but I've kept large (and later small) to emphasise the relative sizes of the ships.--Jackyd101 (talk) 21:34, 19 November 2017 (UTC)


 * In the strength section of infoxbox, insert an nbsp amid HMS Agamemnon.
 * Section 1;
 * Link Vice-Admiral
 * small 64-gun HMS Agamemnon; usage of "small" may not be required
 * young Captain Horatio Nelson
 * Link Commodore
 * small 28-gun frigate Mignonne and 14-gun brig-sloop Hazard; use of "small"
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 16:55, 17 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Section 2;
 * held a council of war to decided "decide" whether the action should be renewed
 * Everything else looks good
 * Section 3;
 * A comma after "Following the engagement"
 * Everything else looks good
 * The image used doesn't have a valid license. Please do the needful.
 * No plagiarism found. External links OK.
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:31, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * All done or otherwise fixed. Best--Jackyd101 (talk) 21:34, 19 November 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 08:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 08:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 08:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)