Talk:Activated charcoal cleanse

Consensus needed on the inclusion of the link to Quackery in the see also section
this is a place called the talk page. Here we can discuss your desire to remove the link to "Quackery" from the "See also" section of the page and hopefully achieve consensus as per WP:CON. I've stopped reverting your edits so that we can open a dialogue here in the hope of resolving the matter and avoiding an edit war as per WP:EDITWAR.

A "See also" section is used to enable readers to explore relevant, tangentially related topics as per MOS:SEEALSO. Activated charcoal cleanses are a form of pseudoscience, also known as quackery. The quackery page is an interesting and relevant read for anyone who is keen to explore the concepts of pseudoscience and alternative medicine further. I think this qualifies the quackery page as a relevant and tangentially related topic and I believe it's quite reasonable to allow it to stay on the page. What are your thoughts? Please reply below. OneUpOnUs (talk) 00:34, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree. The sources support including the see-also Quackery link. CatCafe (talk) 01:35, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Perhaps more background on the cultural use of activated charcoal cleanses could be included?Millerbj1837 (talk) 23:27, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, do you have any specific relevant articles you'd like to use? OneUpOnUs (talk) 00:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)