Talk:Active 20-30 Club

Sexual misconduct section
I am opening this section so that you can explain your rationale in repeatedly removing the sexual misconduct section. The information seems to be well sourced and the only rationale you have provided (in your edit summaries) is that the information is "never proven, vetted, and completely one sided". Wikipedia does not need information to be "proven or vetted" (whatever that means), only that it has been published in a reliable source. As for "one sided", if you have reliable sources that present another side to this story, you are welcome to add that information along with the references to the sources. But you cannot simply remove sourced information without a policy-based rationale. CodeTalker (talk) 18:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

This section was removed again on 14 February 2022, I'm readding it. LeslieCarr (talk) 21:57, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * It was removed again 8 November 2022, I reverted today. Earlier I had tried to edit the description of the event a bit to match the San Francisco Chronicle articles, and we can discuss appropriate weight it should receive, but at the moment I don't see the case for removing the sourced content. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  06:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC)