Talk:Active sitting

active sitting is not appropriate for long term, because it provokes muscular reflexes which distracts from work and undiserably affects muscles in long term. active sitting is very appropriate as a training tool.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Active sitting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120328061129/http://www.inqa.de/Inqa/Navigation/publikationen,did=247754.html?view=renderPrint/ to http://www.inqa.de/Inqa/Navigation/publikationen,did=247754.html?view=renderPrint/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928141906/http://www.rehabpub.com/features/672002/8.asp to http://www.rehabpub.com/features/672002/8.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

The state of the article, December 2016
This article is written as an essay advocating for active sitting. It is way too detailed as it makes its case. Though it is sourced, there are few inline citations, leading me to suppose there could be a great deal of original research and WP:synthesis here. Finally, a lot of it is stated in terms of the current state of the field, but it was written five years ago or more, which means it is outdated anyway, unless this has been a dormant field of research during the years since then. Largoplazo (talk) 21:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)