Talk:Acts of Peter

anti-Catholic diatribe
I have replaced the drivel anti-Catholic diatribe that was added as the new article with info found on a respectable site quoting the Anchor Bible Dictionary (not sure of the copyright implications) Kuratowski's Ghost 22:26, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Could someone correct this phrase?
Could someone correct this phrase? "during the second half of the 2d century". Does this mean the 2nd century? (03/04/2007)
 * ..."during the second half of the 2d century" means between 150-200 AD. DiverDave (talk) 16:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Can we get some citations
Can we get some citations, especially those in regards to dating the manuscript.96.32.183.205 (talk) 18:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I have provided an inline citation for this. DiverDave (talk) 16:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Quo vadis
If the source, of at least most common usage of the phrase Quo vadis is from the Acts of Peter, this should be mentioned in the article. 78.69.107.39 (talk) 08:00, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Apocryphal
there is no such thing as an apocryphal gospel. wouldn't heretic or heterodox,or non canonical be a better term? 67.176.160.47 (talk) 05:25, 22 August 2010 (UTC)


 * The term "apocryphal gospel" simply refers to all of the gospels which have been deemed by widespread consensus to be non-canonical. DiverDave (talk) 15:57, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

No cannonical text mentions Peter's death?
"No canonical text refers to the death of Saint Peter"

This is false. John 21:19 states:

Jesus said this to indicate the kind of death by which Peter would glorify God. Then he said to him, “Follow me!”

So in fact, Peter's death is mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:8D13:D700:F552:B378:3B4D:A5CC (talk) 20:49, 5 June 2022 (UTC)