Talk:Adán Medrano Rodríguez/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 01:52, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey man, I'll review this one, too. Comments should be added soon. Kingsif (talk) 01:52, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Criteria

 * Style - Pass well written, structure, and connected throughout
 * Coverage - Pass appears to hit all the info available, gives good context without being excessive
 * Illustration - Pass one image of subject at top, might do with another image but not necessary
 * Neutrality - Hold generally good, one note in "Arrest and reaction" Pass
 * Stability - Pass months since an edit not for ref cleanup
 * Verifiability - Pass good range of RS and everything cited inline
 * Copyright - Pass Check clear

Lead

 * Good length for article
 * Good coverage of major points and activities
 * Well-written
 * All claims sourced in main article body
 * Good use of wikilinks for information that doesn't need detailed context here
 * Good infobox

Early life and career

 * Well written and clear
 * Comprehensive
 * Perhaps the very start is not the best place for the FBI profile, however, it does work nicely within the section and would not be suitable in the other sections, which don't seem to deal with the FBI. This is to say, it works well where it is, and only if the article were to be restructured (which it does not need) would it suit going anyway else.
 * Good use of wikilinks
 * Good use of note to include extensive list of codenames
 * Could rephrase the start of the last paragraph to be more focused on Medrano than García Mena.
 * ✅ MX ( ✉  •  ✎  ) 18:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Arrest and reaction

 * "16:00 hours" in Standard American English would be rendered as 4 pm
 * Perhaps a better term than "rescue" could be used - it sounds vaguely heroic when it would be a prison-break of a dangerous criminal
 * Otherwise, written very well with good structure throughout
 * Good use of wikilinks and inline explanations where relevant
 * Extensive coverage
 * ✅ MX ( ✉  •  ✎  ) 18:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Custody and imprisonment

 * "military installation" reads a bit odd, perhaps 'facility' is a more common term
 * I'm pretty sure "evidence" is a collective noun, i.e. not pluralized
 * Possible concern over OR re. the Quintero Payáns, but well explained and sourced in note, so doesn't breach policy
 * Still well written
 * Suitable coverage
 * ✅ MX ( ✉  •  ✎  ) 18:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Conviction and release

 * Good explanation of what a minimum wage sentence is.
 * Any reason given why González Sánchez wasn't happy (I can guess, but if there are sources available, it could be included)
 * Good coverage otherwise.
 * ✅ MX ( ✉  •  ✎  ) 18:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Overall

 * on hold Looks good, anything that needs attention has been pinged to . Kingsif (talk) 18:21, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I believe I've addressed all your points. Thank you for the thorough review! MX ( ✉  •  ✎  ) 18:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Symbol support vote.svg Fantastic! Kingsif (talk) 18:40, 18 September 2019 (UTC)