Talk:Adam's Lament (Pärt)

A stub?
Not going to fight over it, but this article says a lot about a short work, with decent sources. For me, a stub is an unsourced one-liner. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:13, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Why don't you use class=start, made for anything better than an unsourced one-liner, but not yet classy? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * now is "class=start"--Estopedist1 (talk) 07:19, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you. For me, a stub is an article that needs work, while a start article would profit from expansion, but is decent as it is. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:27, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * On Wikipedia, "a Wikipedia:Stub is an article deemed too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject." A start-class article "has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas." This was closer to a stub, but the concern about deletion lingers. Certainly not a c-class article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:50, 6 February 2020 (UTC)