Talk:Adam Greenfield

Untitled
Article Adam Greenfield listed on WP:VFD Apr 26 to May 3 2004, consensus was to keep. Discussion:

Vanity, and a relatively content-free stub. UninvitedCompany 22:37, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Hard to say--probably lean towards delete. Web search hits impressive, but neither msnbc.com, cnn.com, nor even wired.com have heard of him. Niteowlneils 23:06, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, although only barely. RickK 23:24, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep -- notable enough. Everyking 23:31, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Borderline case. After flipping through some Google hits, I lean toward keep.  Plenty of people seem to have heard of both him and his work.  Isomorphic 01:17, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. When he's notable enough, he'll find his way back in and we will all be 100% satisfied. Jeeves 18:16, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * But he already is notable enough, apparently. And certainly in a borderline case, we should err on the side of preserving content. Everyking 19:27, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)

End discussion