Talk:Adam Hamilton (pastor)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Adam Hamilton (pastor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090117131521/http://outreachmagazine.com:80/docs/top100_2007_largest.pdf to http://www.outreachmagazine.com/docs/top100_2007_largest.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080830005147/http://www.goodnewsmag.org/magazine/NovemberDecember/nd07vision-hamilton.htm to http://www.goodnewsmag.org/magazine/NovemberDecember/nd07vision-hamilton.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adam Hamilton (pastor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090817161554/http://www.cor.org/about-resurrection/adam to http://www.cor.org/about-resurrection/adam/
 * Added tag to http://rss.pitch.com/2002-12-19/news/christmas-eve-at-adam-s-house/1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

ALREADY DELETED
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion == The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:21, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Adam 3.jpg

Time to remove “Neutrality Disputed” (?).
1 - Evidently nothing has been added for several years (2018, and even that didn’t really suggest any disputes).

2 - There is no indication in the talk as to why the article ever was disputed.

Either one should be sufficient to justify removing the “neutrality disputed” section (?). Or, if it IS disputed, somebody should indicate why. Thanks.

In light of the recent postponement of the international UMC conference, it really would be good if somebody could update this page to clarify this important leader’s position in the ongoing discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:101:8200:78A0:A006:491E:86A7:FA1D (talk) 18:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Please remove “Neutrality Disputed”
I second the request from 2 years ago titled “Time to remove ‘Neutrality Disputed” (?).” Please see details in that request. It has now been an additional 2 years. This needs to be updated. Thank you! 2605:A601:AC13:5700:B5F4:FEC4:6CCB:1AE8 (talk) 11:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)