Talk:Adam Nagourney

Surely there's a more balanced analysis of his politics than to merely say that people criticize his coverage of Democrats. I hate how Wikipedia degenerates into "he said/she said", point/counterpoint, but that's probably preferable to only "he said", yes? - PhilipR 03:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I removed questionable, poorly source material. Nothing else appears to be controversial so I'm removing POV tag. Ronnotel 04:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

a new york times article by the subject in question is poorly sourced? a video link that shows comments that surely many would find controvsial isn't relevant? and i did want to go back to change 'presidential nominee' to 'presidential aspirant'

Jerry Brown
I removed questionable, poorly source material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor268 (talk • contribs) 06:57, 23 June 2015 (UTC)