Talk:Adam Sedgwick

[Untitled]
An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the Adam_Sedgwick article:

Additionally, there are some other articles which may be able to linked to this one (also known as "backlinks"): Notes: The article text has not been changed in any way; Some of these suggestions may be wrong, some may be right. Feedback: I like it, I hate it, Please don't link to &mdash; LinkBot 11:32, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Can link geological timescale: ...rn geology. He proposed the Devonian period of the geological timescale and later the Cambrian period.  The latter proposal was...
 * Can link rock strata: ... proposal was based on work which he did on Welsh rock strata ....
 * In Genetics, can backlink Adam Sedgwick: ...[William Bateson]] coins the term "genetics" in a letter to Adam Sedgwick ...

Cleanup
This article was tagged as needing expert attention but I can't identify why. The editor who tagged it is retired. I will attempt a cleanup and remove tag unless there are any specific problems that are identified as beyond my generalist capabilities.Cutler 22:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)


 * As it stands now the flag seems not necessary: the article contains plenty of reliably referenced material. I'm taking it out. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:34, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Two Sedwicks
Just to put minds at rest, there were two British Adam Sedgwicks in natural science! The subject of this article was Old Adam, whereas the other was Young Adam. Young Adam was a distant relative, grand-nephew-ish. Any references in letters after 1873 must be to young Adam Sedgwick, zoologist, 1854--1913. OK? Macdonald-ross (talk) 19:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Ephemera or worth mentioning?
Philip Henry Gosse used Sedgwick, alongside Lyell, as a target in his notorious work Omphalos (1857), in which he unsuccessfully attempted to "untie the geological knot" by reconciling old earth creationism with studies suggesting the earth was much older than previously thought. Admittedly much of Gosse's criticism veers towards personal attack rather than anything constructive, but there are several passages where he attempts to evaluate the "flaws" with Sedgwick's own work. Anybody feel it's worth mentioning, or is it too minor a detail for inclusion? Absurdtrousers (talk) 19:21, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Biased Article!
Sedgwick was one of the most important of the early geologists, and it is patently absurd to devote almost the entirety of the article to his opposition to evolution.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Adam Sedgwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110620214431/http://1911encyclopedia.org/ to http://1911encyclopedia.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adam Sedgwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221221829/http://www.amphilsoc.org/mole/view?docId=ead%2FMss.B.Se25L-ead.xml%3Bquery%3D%3Bbrand%3Ddefault to http://www.amphilsoc.org/mole/view?docId=ead%2FMss.B.Se25L-ead.xml%3Bquery%3D%3Bbrand%3Ddefault

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)