Talk:Adams Avenue Parkway/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Lead is a bit short. 1.1 - I know 475 East is a street from knowing about UT roads, but it's not clear from the sentence. Wikilink mph/kph? Spell out 9 percent. 3- 2nd par, last sentence - use a semicolon to avoid run-on. Check MOS to see if they want the 0 in 0.5. Spell out 50.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Links 10-11 dead.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Great article, just needs a few minor fixes. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Great article, just needs a few minor fixes. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Great article, just needs a few minor fixes. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Changes have been made. --Admrboltz (talk) 15:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Passing... --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)