Talk:Addicted to You (Shakira song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hmlarson (talk · contribs) 01:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I have begun the review and will be posting feedback below. As issues are addressed, please add a note indicating your changes to the relevant item below. Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 01:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Lead

 * Please modify "and is one of the merengue-influenced songs from the album" to either "is one of (many/several/a few? or actual #)" or "is a merengue-influenced song from the album"
 * I took the latter approach. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * "Despite having a title in English, " -> change to "Despite having an English title, " or something similar
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * "Critics praised the video's overall appeal and Shakira's appearance." Consider changing to "Many critics"
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Background and composition

 * " Despite having a title in English," change to "Despite having an English title, " or something similar
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Music video

 * Change "at Valencia" to "in Valencia"
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Change T-shirt to t-shirt
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Change "sports shoulder length" to "sports shoulder-length"
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * "The video was met with positive critical reception" --> consider changing to "Critical reception of the video was generally positive" or something similar
 * ✅ --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Certifications

 * Consider combining with Charts section per other GA articles about Shakira songs
 * I merged it since it's just one certification. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Disamb, References & External links

 * Fix link to Idolator
 * --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Fix Top 50 Canciones Anual 2012 reference (dead link)
 * --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Infobox

 * Should Pop/Rock be added as genre?
 * Actually it's neither just pop/rock. I think we should be specific in this category, hence I listed merengue. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You can add multiple. I personally would argue that the genre is pop/rock, more specifically Latin pop with merengue and reggaeton influences/styles (similar to what is described in the lead). This is always a subjective decision/classification, IMO. No change is necessary if you do not agree. Hmlarson (talk) 17:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Review checklist

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Excellent, well-written article. I have a few suggestions listed above; but overall, very well done.
 * Thank you! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Verified.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I have addressed the comments. Thank you for the review! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Great job! I've checked the edits - all looks good. Hmlarson (talk) 17:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I have addressed the comments. Thank you for the review! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Great job! I've checked the edits - all looks good. Hmlarson (talk) 17:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)