Talk:Addington Long Barrow

More notes
Had time today to read through, so here are some more notes. The only other comment is that I still think the section on the Medway Megaliths is too long for appropriate summary style. Other than that and the minor points above I think this is ready for FAC. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:38, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Suggest piping "stone-fruit trees" to Amygdaloideae and getting rid of the species name in the main text; it won't help most readers.
 * The discussion starting "Based on a stylistic analysis" cites several archaeologists; to avoid saying "archaeologist Stuart Pigott...archaeologist Glyn Daniel...archaeologist John H. Evans...archaeologist Ronald F. Jessup" you could start with something like "Archaeologists have proposed several hypotheses for influences on the plan of the Medway Megaliths." Then all the subsequent opinions can be assumed to be from archaeologists.
 * How about a link for Cotswold-Severn group? A redlink would be good if no article exists yet.
 * whether they knew of the oak tree mentioned by Harris, but none had: "knew" and "had" don't work together; I'd make it either "whether they knew of the oak tree mentioned by Harris, but none did" or "whether they had heard of the oak tree mentioned by Harris, but none had".