Talk:Addington Palace

Civil Partnerships
From the article:
 * It is used extensively for weddings and since 21 December 2005 for civil partnerships...

I think most open-minded people agree that the new laws with respect to “civil partnerships” are forward thinking. But it is clearly the same thing as a wedding and weddings are already noted. It's inclusion is really just "politically correct speak", and redundant. I’m removing it not because I’m a homophobe (I’m not), but because it is, in the context of the wording, a POV. If wikipeadia readers want to beat the drum about civil partnerships, there maybe some place here to do it, but this ain't it. Jake b 18:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Addington Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725124240/http://www.palace-fitness.co.uk:80/ to http://www.palace-fitness.co.uk

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:56, 4 October 2016 (UTC)