Talk:Adelaide Productions

Adelaide Productions is not related to SPA.
I'm looking at the article and it says that Adelaide was founded in 1993. So it can't be part of Sony Pictures Animation. DragonKing sent me a message on my talk page and showed a wiki site from Wikia, where it isn't a proper source. I don't see any information saying that Adelaide Productions is part of Sony Pictures Animation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.93.196.190 (talk) 16:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Company is still active
DragonKing22, perhaps you need to pay more attention on both sites and look up more corporation companies to see what's active and inactive, then you don't have to worry about making a complete fool of yourself by edit warring. King Shadeed 20:40, January 23, 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't understand where the information "Defunct June 23, 2014" in the infobox comes from. Is there a source for this? Pinging DragonKing22. Bishonen &#124; talk 05:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC).
 * @King Shadeed I challenge you to a bet King Shadeed! If Adelaide has some involvement with the upcoming Cloudy and Hotel TV series or comes with something new this year or the next year I will leave Wikipedia for good. But if Adelaide doesn't have any involvement with Cloudy and Hotel or doesn't have a new show in 2017 or 2018 you will have to leave Wikipedia for good.
 * Betting won't solve anything, DragonKing22. Proving reliable sources is the thing. What you've failed to do is provide sources that Adelaide Productions is inactive, which is not. Just because The Boondocks ended, doesn't mean that Adelaide Productions became inactive. A legal company can be active and dormant at the same time. What you did was making a fool of yourself with your skeptics and edit warring, which it'll cost you. King Shadeed 15:19, January 24, 2017 (UTC)
 * And by the way, I decline your bet because I know what's going to happen to you. King Shadeed 15:21, January 24, 2017 (UTC)


 * @King Shadeed Pussy!