Talk:Adele Yoshioka

Improper, arbitrary deletion of activist. actor bio page
There are countless biographies of people with less note in their professional work and professional profile that have bios that are not deleted. Someone has attempted to delete this article, without any explanation as to what noteworthiness is and what it is not. And the deletion did not engage on this article's page, did not cite the standards for deletion or inclusion in the attempted deletion of this article.Dogru144 (talk) 23:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Additionally, this article has ample documentation. Furthermore, the proper protocol for deletion is a proposal for deletion, and a time period for the deletion. This latter step was avoided by the deleting editor.Dogru144 (talk) 23:56, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

With the weighing of a decision, a case must be brought, by citing details from the article in connection with the critiques in the box. There was too short a period bringing on the deletion without any discussion. In addition, the deleting editor should explain what is wrong with the particular references --in connection with the problems that the editor believes exist-- instead of only putting a general critique into a box. The editor needs to point out which references are invalid or unreliable.Dogru144 (talk) 00:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Again, editors should engage in the page before speedy deletion without proper process.Dogru144 (talk) 04:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Deletion on claim of no independent sources dubious
This is offered as a source. How is this not an independent source?: San Diego Tribune Dogru144 (talk) 04:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)