Talk:Adem Jashari

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:25, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Adem Jashari Memorial in Prekaz January 2013 09 (cropped).jpg
 * Adem Jashari Memorial in Prekaz January 2013 09.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * AdemJashari.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Adem Jashari statue Drenas.jpg

The first sentence
Can anyone rewrite it in a neutral way? I am not sure what words to use. Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

GA status
I have not been able to find any indication this went through the GA review process. GA was disputed and removed, then readded with the edit summary "Nationalist vandal" ,

I have disputed the GA status because it has not been reviewed and is far from a NPOV stable GA. If an editor feels this meets GA status, please submit for a GA review at Good article nominations per Wikipedia guidelines. If you find a GA review I missed, submit the dispute to Good article reassessment  // Timothy :: talk  03:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)


 * It seems like it has gone through a review (1, 2), although it appears to be incomplete to me. Perhaps you should reach out to the reviewer. StephenMacky1 (talk) 15:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Those comments were 13 and 10 years ago, so the there needs to be a new nomination, the article has changed far too much to continue an old review.  // Timothy :: talk  23:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree. You can freely initiate a GAR then, so that it can get reassessed. I think that's the best way to address the status. StephenMacky1 (talk) 23:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks,  // Timothy :: talk  23:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)