Talk:Adenanthos cuneatus/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

 :
 * Criteria
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).




 * Comments
 * Well, let's start this review... Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Illustration-wise, this article seems to be pretty well off. I made a few grammatical corrections in some of the image captions, and I'm concerned that the captions "Infloresence" and "Coral Drift" might be too short, but I'll worry more about that later, when I've had a chance to look into the context of the article with more detail. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:42, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * There is precious little published info on the cultivar, which makes it hard to write about. (sigh) Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Fortunately, I've found no evidence in the article's history of a recent ongoing edit war/dispute, so it quickly checks against that. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:44, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


 * It looks like it covers every topic you'd expect a plant species article to cover, and I don't think it goes into too much detail on anything. I'd almost say this could go on for FA, actually. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * ''thanks - that was our intention. We pretty well scoured every possible place we'd be likely to find info. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


 * In terms of citing sources, this article appears good. It looks as though only reliable sources have been cited, and the "Footnotes" and "References" sections appear to be appropriately laid out. (I might also add that the "External links" section is also very well laid out!!!) Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * thanks :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

PS: Just reformatted this for clarity (hope you don't mind), and I think a level 4 heading makes sure this bit transcludes on the talk page proper (otherwise it disappears) cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

PPS: the linking and copyediting are all good :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:33, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, with a few tweaks and grammatical corrections, the article has checked against everything! Congratulations! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 03:57, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


 * (in best Elvis voice) why thankyou very much...'' Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC)